Without notes

A couple of nice profiles of attorney Paul D. Clement who will be arguing before the Supreme Court on behalf of the 26 states challenging the constitutionality of President Obama's health care law.
L.A. Times profile here.
New York Times here.
From the Times profile:
"Mr. Clement is admired by colleagues and adversaries for the straightforward clarity of his presentation. He famously argues without notes, leaving his hands free to jab and gesticulate, sometimes as if wringing an imaginary neck.
'He just internalizes every single aspect of the case,' said Viet D. Dinh, Mr. Clement’s law partner. 'He makes the argument not from memory but from total immersion.'"
The Supreme Court will hear five and a half hours of arguments on the health care law. The typical allotment is one hour of arguments. NPR lists other lengthy arguments here.
Bush v. Gore - ninety minutes
Gibbons v. Ogden - twenty hours
McCulloch v. Maryland - nine days
United States v. Nixon - three hours
New York Times v. United States - two hours
Brown v. Board of Education I - eight and a half hours
Brown v. Board of Education II - six and a half hours
Miranda v. Arizona - six hours
South Carolina v. Katzenbach - seven hours



Comments