Cultural Offering is the online sketch book of Kurt J. Harden. The opinions expressed here are mine. I invite you to enjoy, comment, agree or disagree.
10/20/2010 10:25 PMMark wrote:
Isn't it ironic that a Progressive is calling anyone racist? The very basis of the Progressive theory is evolution. Darwin was very clear that he felt different races evolved at different rates and that some were inferior due to this.
If you want to know what a Progressive is doing and thinking, just look at what they accuse others of. I have yet to see them accuse others of something that they they are not already masters of themselves.
As soon as they start losing an argument, they do not present evidence to prove themselves, they accuse their opponent of lacking knowledge and ability to understand their version of "facts". If you don't agree, you just haven't evolved. Reply to this
10/21/2010 9:27 AM
Bud wrote:
Huh??? Evolution?
Anyone, raise your hand out there if you think that anyone gets anything that they think, discover, develop or theorize correct down to the detail in all aspects? Of course Darwin did not know all.
Political "progressivism" = Darwinian biological theory = contra God, I suppose?
We should evolve. I want to evolve. Perhaps you should want to evolve. (Maybe toward developing a truer sense of irony?)
If I'm playing the "progressive" hand here in this game of off-the-wall, I'll meet your Janeane Garofalo and raise you two Glenn Becks, although I think justifiably only one-half a GB should suffice. Reply to this
10/21/2010 7:39 PM
Cultural Offering wrote:
Bud - I haven't seen a Glenn Beck show (or clip) in over a year.
Update: I stand corrected. I actually linked to this speech and found it to be very thoughtful. Reply to this
10/23/2010 2:31 PMMark wrote:
"Political "progressivism" = Darwinian biological theory = contra God, I suppose?"
No, not at all. Progressives love the theory of evolution. It comes up every election and they attach it to things for political gain every chance they get. They feel that the belief in this theory makes them somehow intellectually superior. I know they're wrong.
They prove themselves wrong when they claim not to be racist, but are quick to label Conservatives as racists for any disagreement with them. Most people only know the short version of the theory and go along with it. If you look at the entire theory, it would be impossible to believe unless you also believe that the different races of man developed at different rates with different strengths and weaknesses. They choose to omit this because it is actually glaring proof that the entire theory is wrong and it's not a popular feel-good aspect of the theory.
Here's a progressive trying to claim that "Rednecks" are inferior and lack the ability to understand how a black man is in office. She's claiming a medical defect is causing their racism when the core of her own beliefs are racist. Like the progressive movement, she's a fraud. Her "theory" is a fraud. Her racism is self-evident even as she points the finger at others. Reply to this
Her glasses and elitist whine make me feel like I should be learning something from her ... but what?
Seriously ... who is she?
I remember Olbermann from his SportsCenter days. He was hilarious with Dan Patrick. If this is the same guy, it appears that his methods have most assuredly become unsound. How does an ESPN guy get his own show on ... wait, is that MSNBC? Nevermind.
Garofalo ... there's an ointment for that, isn't there? Reply to this
Isn't it ironic that a Progressive is calling anyone racist? The very basis of the Progressive theory is evolution. Darwin was very clear that he felt different races evolved at different rates and that some were inferior due to this.
If you want to know what a Progressive is doing and thinking, just look at what they accuse others of. I have yet to see them accuse others of something that they they are not already masters of themselves.
As soon as they start losing an argument, they do not present evidence to prove themselves, they accuse their opponent of lacking knowledge and ability to understand their version of "facts". If you don't agree, you just haven't evolved.
Reply to this
Huh??? Evolution?
Anyone, raise your hand out there if you think that anyone gets anything that they think, discover, develop or theorize correct down to the detail in all aspects? Of course Darwin did not know all.
Political "progressivism" = Darwinian biological theory = contra God, I suppose?
We should evolve. I want to evolve. Perhaps you should want to evolve. (Maybe toward developing a truer sense of irony?)
If I'm playing the "progressive" hand here in this game of off-the-wall, I'll meet your Janeane Garofalo and raise you two Glenn Becks, although I think justifiably only one-half a GB should suffice.
Reply to this
Bud - I'd need to see the GB clip. Garofalo is out there.
Reply to this
Yes, she is...but if you find GB legitimate, I am shocked.
Reply to this
Bud - I haven't seen a Glenn Beck show (or clip) in over a year.
Update: I stand corrected. I actually linked to this speech and found it to be very thoughtful.
Reply to this
"Political "progressivism" = Darwinian biological theory = contra God, I suppose?"
No, not at all. Progressives love the theory of evolution. It comes up every election and they attach it to things for political gain every chance they get. They feel that the belief in this theory makes them somehow intellectually superior. I know they're wrong.
They prove themselves wrong when they claim not to be racist, but are quick to label Conservatives as racists for any disagreement with them. Most people only know the short version of the theory and go along with it. If you look at the entire theory, it would be impossible to believe unless you also believe that the different races of man developed at different rates with different strengths and weaknesses. They choose to omit this because it is actually glaring proof that the entire theory is wrong and it's not a popular feel-good aspect of the theory.
Here's a progressive trying to claim that "Rednecks" are inferior and lack the ability to understand how a black man is in office. She's claiming a medical defect is causing their racism when the core of her own beliefs are racist. Like the progressive movement, she's a fraud. Her "theory" is a fraud. Her racism is self-evident even as she points the finger at others.
Reply to this
Who is she?
Her glasses and elitist whine make me feel like I should be learning something from her ... but what?
Seriously ... who is she?
I remember Olbermann from his SportsCenter days. He was hilarious with Dan Patrick. If this is the same guy, it appears that his methods have most assuredly become unsound. How does an ESPN guy get his own show on ... wait, is that MSNBC? Nevermind.
Garofalo ... there's an ointment for that, isn't there?
Reply to this
Rob, that is, without doubt, the funniest comment I've ever seen at CO.
Reply to this