Memo from a Democrat
"The Democrats need to do a number of things. First and foremost, they need to recognize there is only one fundamental issue in America: jobs. Unless there are pro-growth policies of the kind that have been articulated by the Kauffman Foundation and are supported by 70% to 80% of the American people according to Kauffman-sponsored research, Democrats are not going to win enough support quickly enough to reclaim their credibility.
These policies include a broad-based payroll tax holiday, building from the one Sens. Charles Schumer (D., N.Y.) and Orrin Hatch (R., Utah) have embraced, an extension of the Bush tax cuts, educational initiatives to educate the next generation of entrepreneurs, and tax policies that provide clear incentives to small businesses to get started and to hire new employees. Of late, President Obama has paid lip-service to the concept of creating private-sector jobs, but there is much more he can and should do to become the 'jobs president' rather than the 'health-care president.'"
I disagree with several of his prescriptions but he does seem to understand the importance of the political shift at play. The Economist sees it as well.



Schoen, like so many other pundits, assumes that Obama and Democrats in Congress want an economic recovery. I see no evidence to support that assumption. Quite the opposite. The evidence suggests that Obama wants to be America's answer to Clement Attlee, and the Democrats are doing what they can to help. Andrew Stuttaford agrees. http://nrd.nationalreview.com/article/?q=YjE3NThjMTg3NzhmNGU0ZDA4MGJlMjYxZjkyNmIxYWU=
Reply to this
I find any expectation that anyone would hope for Obama to become the "jobs President". He's never held a position that I would consider a "job" until recently. You would have to consider promoting Marxism a job to consider him previously employed. How would he know anything about how to create them if he's never really had one?
Seeing the words Obama and "private sector" in the same article just doesn't seem to fit.
Reply to this